On March 1, 2010, it was announced that Wal-Mart reached an $11.7 million settlement with the EEOC, ending an almost nine-year-old class action lawsuit. The action, filed August 24, 2001, accuses Wal-Mart of discriminating against female job candidates for orderfiller positions at its London, Kentucky distribution center.
Under the settlement, the first 50 openings for orderfiller positions at the London, Kentucky distribution center must be filled by female class members from a list provided by the EEOC. For the next 50 orderfiller openings, every other position will be filled by a female class member from the EEOC list. Thereafter, one of every three available orderfiller positions must be filled by an individual from the list. Individuals offered the job are still subject to the criteria applicable all applicants for that position.
In addition, Wal-Mart has agreed not to discriminate against females in filling orderfiller positions, to refrain from retaliating against those who oppose unlawful employment practices or participate in investigations or proceedings under Title VII, and to provide ongoing Title VII training to interviewers and managers. Wal-Mart will also “make an effort to place its advertisements for employment in local publications which are geared toward female readers.” A copy of the consent decree is available here.
For more information on The Employment Law Group® law firm’s Employment Discrimination Practice, click here.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010 at 10:51 am and is filed under Sex Discrimination, Title VII Discrimination.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
Ada federal lawyers washington dc, Age discrimination Maryland lawyer, Age discrimination attorney, DC Discrimination, DC Employment Discrimination, Discrimination in the workplace, Discrimination law, Discrimination lawyer, Employment Discrimination, Employment law DC, Employment law, Employment lawyer, Hiring discrimination, Top employment lawyer, age discrimination, age discrimination act, age discrimination attorney, age discrimination cases, age discrimination claim, age discrimination counsel, discrimination law offices, hostile work environment, age discrimination employment act, Quid pro quo harassment, DC Discrimination attorney, Civil Right lawyer in Washington dc, Disability attorney, Disability discrimination, Disability discrimination attorney, Disability discrimination lawyer, Disability employment discrimination, Disability employment law, Discrimination law offices, Employment law, Employment law dc, Hiring discrimination, Physical disability discrimination, Top employment lawyer, Workplace disability discrimination, Workplace discrimination, disability attorney, disability discrimination act, disability discrimination law, social security disability attorney, social security disability lawyer, gender discrimination, sex discrimination, employee rights on sexual harassment Virginia, employment harassment, employment lawyer, harassment in workplace, harassment lawyer in Washington dc, harassment lawyers, hostile environment sexual harassment, hostile work environment, Maryland sexual harassment, sexual harassment at workplace, sexual harassment attorney, sexual harassment in the work place, sexual harassment law, sexual harassment lawyer, sexual harassment policies, sexual harassment policy, termination, workplace sexual harassment, wrongful terminationlawyers, harassment attorney, LGBT Discrimination Attorneys, Employment discrimination against gays, Employment discrimination against Lesbians, Gay Issues in Workplace, Gender based discrimination, Harassment discrimination, LGBT Workplace Discrimination, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Transgender discrimination, gay discrimination, gay rights attorneys, gay rights lawyers
lifestyle discrimination